news, tips, and reviews that make thinking machines useful
X
Tag archive
Everything we’ve published under AI Workflows so far.
Follow this lane
AI Workflows appears in workflow adoption, a useful buying-intent lane for relevant AI products and services.
Romain Huet confirmed that OpenAI's dedicated Codex line is dead. The main model and the coding model are now the same system, changing how builders should evaluate GPT-5.5.
xAI’s new voice model claims top spot on the Tau Voice Bench, promising to survive background noise and interruptions. But a capable voice model still needs you to know what you want it to do.
The new prompt guidance for GPT-5.5 is an exercise in demolition. The advice isn't to add new magic words; it's to clear out legacy prompt debt and define the destination rather than the path.
API access means teams can stop admiring GPT-5.5 from the showroom and start deciding where it actually deserves production budget.
OpenAI’s workspace agents sound autonomous, but the useful test is much duller: can they take a real workflow, preserve context, and return an artifact that is actually reviewable?
OpenAI pitches its new model as better at complex coding and data analysis. The real test is whether it can navigate messy workflows without requiring constant human cleanup.
OpenAI’s new agent observability tools sound like developer jargon, but they represent the difference between useful delegation and finding out your bot rearranged the CRM while you were asleep.
OpenAI’s deep research tool lets you restrict sources and interrupt runs. The real lesson isn't that AI can summarize the web, but that research is useless if you can't defend the citations later.
Zapier's look at the future of workflow automation emphasizes human-in-the-loop systems, proving that the best AI knows when to step back.
Anthropic’s hybrid reasoning model lets users choose whether they want a fast answer or a deep thought. It's the right product move in a market obsessed with confusing model menus.
Microsoft’s Frontier Firm vision of hybrid AI teams is compelling, but practically, companies just need one human owner, one repeatable workflow, and a clear way to review failures.